Lack of consistency in claim of "pro-choice" among officials
Posted by
follow me
,
at
1:59 PM
Whether you agree that conservation is good or not is beside the point. As Sen. Paul argues, the way to encourage conservation (if that is what is best for society) is to logically convince others to voluntarily choose to conserve, rather than to force your opinions on others. Claiming outright that you know better and forcing others to act in a certain way or limiting their choices is degrading (and very costly).
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular entries
-
As Europe’s leaders struggle to convince markets that their Greek debt problem-resolution-proposals are actually viable, and will really do ...
-
China has its fingers in nearly every aspect of global financing as the following articles show. San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge Now Made i...
-
Basically, following up on this post earlier this month I wish to report that the 3 month euro libor rate is still stuck where it was, way ...
-
There is indeed a 100% guaranteed safe way to own gold and silver. But before addressing how, a basic question must first be addressed: Why ...
-
With the timing of the latest G20 meeting set to coincide with the run-in to the German elections acrimonious debate has not been absent , b...
-
Europe's manufacturing and service industries contracted in September at the fastest pace in nearly seven years as continuing problems i...
-
Bloomberg is reporting EU Renews WTO Complaint Over U.S. `Zeroing' Practice . The European Union wants World Trade Organization judges t...
-
Why have routine (and not so routine) medical and dental services performed in the US when you can have them done cheaper elsewhere and get ...
-
Reader Jeddy spots what he thinks is a conflict in my typical "privatization" message and inquires Hello Mish I'm confused abo...
-
Equity futures are down sharply in Asia, Australia, Europe, and the US in conjunction with data that shows manufacturing in China is barely ...