Barro - The Stimulus Evidence One Year Later
Posted by
follow me
,
at
1:43 PM
With the anniversary of President Obama signing the stimulus bill Harvard economist Robert Barro weighs in this week in the WSJ. He estimates the effects of the stimulus package over the long run and evaluates whether a second stimulus bill would be beneficial. The punch line for Barro "Thus, viewed over five years, the fiscal stimulus package is a way to get an extra $600 billion of public spending at the cost of $900 billion in private expenditure. This is a bad deal."
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular entries
-
As Europe’s leaders struggle to convince markets that their Greek debt problem-resolution-proposals are actually viable, and will really do ...
-
Steen Jakobsen, chief economist for Saxo Bank in Copenhagen, pinged me with a personal thought regarding Europe: " I am just back from ...
-
China has its fingers in nearly every aspect of global financing as the following articles show. San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge Now Made i...
-
Europe's manufacturing and service industries contracted in September at the fastest pace in nearly seven years as continuing problems i...
-
Ok, well yesterday I gave a brief resumé and outline of the state of the German labour market, about why the recent drop in unemployment is...
-
Basically, following up on this post earlier this month I wish to report that the 3 month euro libor rate is still stuck where it was, way ...
-
Why have routine (and not so routine) medical and dental services performed in the US when you can have them done cheaper elsewhere and get ...
-
Equity futures are down sharply in Asia, Australia, Europe, and the US in conjunction with data that shows manufacturing in China is barely ...
-
The FBI made numerous claims in today's official press conference. They are largely refuted by Dr. Meryl Nass, an expert on anthrax. I...
-
Kevin Hassett, an economist at AEI and an adviser to John McCain, is stepping into the debate over whether NBA referees are fixing games (vi...