It's a start! Yesterday the senate voted to end the tax breaks and federal subsidies for ethanol. See http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304319804576389843694911096.html?KEYWORDS=ethanol. This may be a signal that the Senate will begin to examine all of the corporate welfare that it doles out each year. Crony capitalism as opposed to true capitalism occurs when businesses use the government to make rules or bestow benefits such that the business can become more profitable. Under true capitalism, businesses must add value to resources so that we the consumer are willing to pay more than the cost of production to purchase the product. In this case, both consumers and producers profit based on the values they place on the product. In free enterprise, businesses and consumers trade value for value. I bought the computer I am using to write this blog because I value it more than the price I paid for it. Toshiba sold it to me because they value the dollars I paid for it more than their costs of production.
In crony capitalism, firms use government mandates to block production or raise costs to other producers or they receive subsidies. In the first case, we saw that firms such as Archer Daniels Midland, ADM, benefited from the 54 cents per gallon tariff on imported ethanol. Ethanol is much cheaper to produce in Latin America, where it is made from sugar cane. This tariff increased the price of imported ethanol and also increased the demand for American (ADM) made ethanol which uses corn as the main ingredient. The consequence of this tariff is that the price of corn increased dramatically and over 40% of the corn produced in the U.S. was used for ethanol. This had huge secondary effects. The price of consumable corn increased as well as the price of all other products that use corn such as pork.
Making matters worse, the government subsidized gasoline blenders 45 cents per gallon of ethanol. This also increased the demand for corn ethanol, pushing up the price of corn.
Although the Senate has taken this first step to remove the crony capitalism, it does not remove the mandate that gasoline contain 10 percent ethanol. Thus ethanol producers are still the beneficiaries of crony capitalism. The result is that we will move to sugar ethanol increasing the price of sugar and reducing the price of corn.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular entries
-
The state of Minnesota failed to process submitted license renewals for Miller and Coors beer products before the government shutdown. As a ...
-
Spain's economy is now most evidently, and totally and completely officially, in its first recession since 1993. The final confirmation ... -
The U.S. has imprisoned 2,500 children since 9/11 as "enemy combatants", in violation of the Geneva Convention against classifyi...
-
Once again I am in a musical mood. It's time for a remake of a classic Jerry Lee Lewis song. I said come on over baby A-whole lotta hop...
-
The looming problem of what will happen as and when some of the other Eurozone economies eventually start to recover while the Spanish one l... -
There are two ways builders can pass home inspections. Build quality homes to code Hire their own inspectors Following is an email fr...
-
In his column today, Paul Krugman reminds us of the press event in 2003 where "officials from multiple agencies used pruning shears an... -
German exports and investment spending plunged in the first quarter, dragging Europe’s largest economy into its deepest economic slump on re... -
Unemployment in Spain, which was the source of half the eurozone's new jobs between 2001 and 2006, was up sharply in the second quarter ... -
As Europe’s leaders struggle to convince markets that their Greek debt problem-resolution-proposals are actually viable, and will really do ...
Posts
